Joined
·
2 Posts
Many similarities with 55 Chevy on my 55 Pontiac Star Chief, body parts etc, Any opinions out there?
It is to me! And you will find some other tri-five Pontiac's here also.Many similarities with 55 Chevy on my 55 Pontiac Star Chief, body parts etc, Any opinions out there?
Perhaps the better way to look at the question is: 1955-1957 was a unique and dare I say - magical - time for American cars.
The '55 Chevy introduced a V8 to compete with Ford's longstanding history of V8s. The '56 introduced the dual 4 barrel V8. The '57 Chevy continued the dual 4 barrel carbs and introduced the fuel injection that hit the magical 1 horsepower per cubic inch.
The Corvette was nearly cancelled, but the V8 made it a performer. No more 6 cylinder Powerglide 'vettes.
Over in the land of Ford, the 2 passenger Thunderbird was going head-to head with the Corvette. The '55-56 Crown Victoria is to Ford guys what the tri-five Chevy is to Chevy guys. And, a '57 Ford was featured in the moonshiner movie "Thunder Road".
Chrysler was experimenting with their "Forward Look" - styling you either love or hate. Their first generation hemi engines were making news of their own.
The late '40s and early '50s cars tend to look a bit dull next to '55-57 cars. Many '58 and '59 cars were overdone styling-wise. So, '55-57 was the sweet spot of the decade.
Yes - the '55-57 Chevy overshadows the Pontiac, and the phrase "tri five" has been more or less commandeered by the Chevy guys. But IMHO, real car guys appreciate the Pontiac for what it is.
Let's not forget - Pontiac made fuelies, too...
Wow, I never knew the wheelbases were not the same! I've always noticed the styling similarities between Chevy, Buick, Olds, Pontiac and thought they were all essentially the same platform. I always loved the fact that the tri-five Chevy's were 115 inch wheelbase which was the same as Chevelles. So in my mind, even though the tri-five Chevy's were full size cars for their day, they really were the equivalent to a 60's mid-size car and not "boats", like Impalas, Bonnevilles, and all the other full size models.Lots of the same styling cues. The main difference is the wheel base (115 for the Chevy and 122 or 120 -can’t recall which- for the Buick, olds and Pontiac). I like all the cars of that era. I’ve always thought a hot Rod Olds would be awesome!
The good Olds/Pontiac 9.3 rear came out the same year as the inferior 9 inch Ford 1957. The fine folks at Buick were still using torque tube driveshafts in 57.While Chevy had their little 8.2 drop out and know Caddy had their own deal too. As I prevously stated, and belive a tri five Chevy is not that much like its BOP cousins.Wow, I never knew the wheelbases were not the same! I've always noticed the styling similarities between Chevy, Buick, Olds, Pontiac and thought they were all essentially the same platform. I always loved the fact that the tri-five Chevy's were 115 inch wheelbase which was the same as Chevelles. So in my mind, even though the tri-five Chevy's were full size cars for their day, they really were the equivalent to a 60's mid-size car and not "boats", like Impalas, Bonnevilles, and all the other full size models.
However, I remember hearing from Old School Hot Rodders that the Chevy rear ends were the weakest part of the car (next to the trunk sheet metal shock mounts), and that they were often replaced with Buick, Olds, or Pontiac rear ends because they were more heavy duty. Long before the Ford 9 inch thing took over. So, in that sense I guess it's fair to consider them kin.
Well the fact that those two doors are interchangeable come from the Hollander manual.If I really cared to know similarities of the GM models the easy whay to do it is sit down with my late 50s Hollander Interchange Manual. A much more accuaate source if information than the internet.