Chevy Tri Five Forum banner

Need more CAMBER

11572 Views 19 Replies 11 Participants Last post by  gconnsr
Am doing alignment in the AM on my 56 at work. A few weeks ago I checked it and Camber on rt side is out to negative side.
Is there any way to correct this??? I have CCP tubular uppers and stock bottoms. Left/drivers side is ok/ Rt side appears to have been hit once upon a time. I was thinking to remove upper cntrl arm and grind down the cross shaft to get more pos Camber. Any ideas here??


thanks phil.
1 - 20 of 20 Posts
Phil.....I'm afraid grinding your own may be a hit or miss situation....They have 2* offset caber upper control arms available....See link:http://www.classicchevy.com/chevy-upper-control-arm-shafts-2-positive-camber-1955-1957.html

See less See more
Phil.....I'm afraid grinding your own may be a hit or miss situation....They have 2* offset caber upper control arms available....See link:http://www.classicchevy.com/chevy-upper-control-arm-shafts-2-positive-camber-1955-1957.html

Interesting that I was looking these up on several web sights, one say's it corrects camber, other one Mutton Hollow, say's caster. I don't see the caster changing.:confused0006:
Thanks, but cant use em. I have CCP uppers.
Thought maybe I could machine off 1/8th of an inch here...



Anyone think this will hurt strucural integrity of the cntrl arm? It sits flush now with no shims on pass side and still has neg camber.
What I really need is a new frame!
See less See more
Maybe have the frame pulled so the ft xmember sag is removed?? A common problem w/ 50 yo frames...
I agree with Chuck, a front end/frame shop can straighten the crossmember.
2
Any body shop that does frame repairs can put your car on a frame rack and easily pull the front crossmember to gain more positive camber. They can do it without taking the car apart. The set up looks like this:



The problem of a lack of positive camber on these cars made the Chevrolet Service News in February 1956. In the article they suggested unbolting the lower control arm shafts, welding up the holes in the crossmember, and drilling new holes. While this method would work, it is cheaper and faster to simply spread the crossmember a small amount with hydraulic jacks.

See less See more
3
thanks guys, Steve, nice pic/visual. Here is the results of alignment I did on Hunter equipment at work today.



I adjusted left front camber to neg side to compensate for rt side. Cross camer is in the green. However, you see actually that it is Caster that is out. I have seen posts here that say to add 1/4 more pos caster to pass side to compensate for road crown. I cant get any more out of pass side. As I said, control arm is but against tower. Toe is good, but you can see from specs that car will pull to the right, and it does, not real bad, but enough.

Steve, you posted add on the welding holes idea is good as well. You can see here that I had the common damage here, on right side only.



This is also why I had these braces made ( by prostreet ), and bolted them in, then welded to add some support as the lower cntrl arms want to push back as you drive.



So the idea of the frame pulling may work here. While the tires on the front are not super expensive and last a while (second set), and I could probably live with it, it drives me crazy
See less See more
You have a problem with both camber and caster. Even if your camber was good at -0.5 degree, you'd still have negative caster.

Whether you could cut down the control arm shaft to get a bit more adjustment is hard to say. Obviously the shafts are thick enough across the bolt holes - what you'd have to watch is whether there would be a negative step or undercut at the stub shaft, or if this area would hit the frame if moved closer by the amount of the cut.

One thing I'm puzzled about is that these control arms don't have the usual 5 degrees of positive caster built in, like most aftermarket control arms do. Is this a feature you want or were expecting?

It's also questionable whether you could use the offset shafts that are on the market, as the shafts in your control arms are definitely not stock - so they may not exchange with stock or stock replacement shafts.

If you want to keep the control arms your best way out may be to get the crossmember bent back into correct dimensions.

Auggie said, "one say's it corrects camber, other one Mutton Hollow, say's caster. I don't see the caster changing."

Auggie, the offset shafts can correct both. Here's how: If the top of the tire leans inboard (negative camber), the offset shaft can help, as it will require adding shims to put the camber where it originally was. Then you can remove shims to get more positive camber.

Now let's say you have the camber you want and need to add more positive caster. The way you increase caster without changing camber is to remove a shim at the front control arm shaft bolt, and move that shim to the rear. If you run out of shims while setting caster, the offset shaft (or any other similar cure) will let you remove and add shims to increase caster.
See less See more
Auggie said, "one say's it corrects camber, other one Mutton Hollow, say's caster. I don't see the caster changing."

Auggie, the offset shafts can correct both. Here's how: If the top of the tire leans inboard (negative camber), the offset shaft can help, as it will require adding shims to put the camber where it originally was. Then you can remove shims to get more positive camber.

Now let's say you have the camber you want and need to add more positive caster. The way you increase caster without changing camber is to remove a shim at the front control arm shaft bolt, and move that shim to the rear. If you run out of shims while setting caster, the offset shaft (or any other similar cure) will let you remove and add shims to increase caster.
OK I see now, Thanks.:tu
I think I should have my donor frame stretched before I powder coat. The reference measurement is about 3/8" too short and may prove difficult to align properly.

How much should I expect to pay to have the front crossmember stretched? I don't want to get ripped off when I go get the work done :confused0006:

Thanks -
Jon
Rick...
The CCP cntrl arms are supposed to have 5 deg caster, Thats what puzzles me as well.

You don't think I have cntl arms in backwards do you, ie swithed sides?
Boy would I feel stupid after riding around three years like this!
Here's a pic...

See less See more
There's no way your control arms could be installed backwards.
I don't no why they don't make upper A frames like we use on circle track cars? Vintage 5-7 cars have them... instead of round holes you have SLOTTED holes you can move the A frame front to rear and get any caster you want, the shaft is offset but to us offset means one part of the shaft is thinner where you bolt it to the A frame plate so you flip the shaft one way or the other to get the camber you want, how hard is that?
YIKES!,,$215 for 1 SPC arm??. Ease of adjustment for sure, but they are proud of them.
I would put that CPP A frame in a BPT and slot it a 1/16 and add a shim block or take away metal for the camber before i put it on a frame machine or bought that A frame, whats the frame machine charge about 500.00?
Jim, thanks for the info on those adjustable a arms. I tried doing a search for those but could not find them. I had seen a similar product on a roadster once. I tink the 215.00 ea is a great deal for what they do. I see Summit has em too. I could sell mt CCP's on Ebay to recoop some cost. They are great, just not for my car.
I just wonder what the minimum specs are. They adjust yes, but now my right side is pulled in tight with no shims. This a cntrl arm would have to be shorter to start with. I am going to ivestigate these, and calling for estimate from body shop.
G
Thanks, but cant use em. I have CCP uppers.
Thought maybe I could machine off 1/8th of an inch here...



Anyone think this will hurt strucural integrity of the cntrl arm? It sits flush now with no shims on pass side and still has neg camber.
What I really need is a new frame!
If you take a good look at that picture the control arm is upside down and the ball joint goes under the control arm. I have seen guys (habbit) set the ball joint on top and this is wrong for a CPP tubular. If this is the problem switching it under the control arm might give you the camber you're looking for.
G
I have another thought.:D It looks like you have a ton of work into the car and I don't know if you played with the front springs. If one of the springs where not clocked right or seated properly it would cause that side to sit higher and pull the camber negative. Same thing with a sagging spring on the other side, it would push the camber on that side positive. :anim_25:
1 - 20 of 20 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top