Chevy Tri Five Forum banner

Chevy offered 1 hp per cu.in. for the 1956 model year

3.1K views 12 replies 7 participants last post by  56 2x4  
#1 ·
I was reading Mechanix Illustrated, June, 1956, p. 86, where test driver Tom McCahill claims that "when equipped with available kits, [the '56 Chevrolet passenger car] can reportedly develop one horsepower per cubic inch of displacement...".

Of course he is referring to the factory kit, not factory production. The closest factory production would be the 1956 RPO 411 dual four barrel setup 225 hp engine in which you would replace the cam with a factory high-lift cam and replace the lifters with solid lifters.

This would then become the "240hp" setup available from the factory in Corvette form. Chevrolet didn't officially call this a 1 hp per cu.in. engine, but a representative from Chevrolet told McCahill that it was so.

So don't let the MoPar guys hornswaggle you with their 1956 Chrysler 300B claim of 1 hp per cu.in. option arriving before Chevrolet. Chevrolet had it in 1956 too, direct from the factory.
 
#3 ·
If you're asking me, I'm only reporting what I read and arriving at a conclusion.;)
 
#6 ·
I have reviewed the article (Mechanix Illustrated, June 1956, p. 86-) with that in mind and can report back to you that McCahill is referring to the 265 cu.in. engine and has photographed and is test driving a 1956 Chevrolet 150 two-door sedan.

There is no mention of the 1957 Chevrolet.
 
#7 ·
McCahill claims you can gain 15-25 hp when you loose the fan belt, for which 1956 RPO 411 had a reputation. But since McCahill as a judge disqualified 1956 Chevrolets at the speed trials for this reason, I would be led to believe that he took that into consideration in his writeup.
 
#10 ·
I'd tolerate the nickname "blowhard" for a job like that for 20+ years.:cool: Where do I sign up?:cool:
 
#12 ·
I have an original '56 slick brochure, 22 pages in all. Someday I'll scan it into a .pdf file.

The most powerful engine available in a full-size Chevy in 1956?

Corvette V8
Valve-in-head V8 engine. 225 h.p. at 5200 rpm; torque, 270 ft-lbs at 3600 rpm. 265 cubic inch displacement. 3.75" bore, 3.0" stroke, 9.25 to 1 compression ratio. Dual four-barrel carburetors, two oil bath air cleaners, special high-lift camshaft, high-speed mechanical valve lifters, high-power exhaust headers, dual exhaust system.


COPYRIGHT 1956 -- CHEVROLET MOTOR DIVISION, GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION.
 
#13 ·
Yes, that is true for the beginning of the model run. But into the model run, all major top-end castings changed for this engine and two different horsepower ratings were offered.

According to Chevrolet Technical Service Bulletin DR #270 dated November 8, 1956, the dual 4-barrel engine could be fitted with a regular camshaft or with a racing camshaft. The engine number suffixes were "GR" and "GU", respectively for the Corvettes, and "GS" and "GT" respectively for the passenger car, according to this bulletin.

Remember, engine number suffixes are stamped at the factory. The factory was building two different 2x4's: regular versions and racing versions.

I am assuming the racing camshaft was a high lift camshaft with solid lifters and was a design indended to modify a horsepower rating, but the only source I can think of right now that would confirm this is Alan Colvin's Chevrolet by the Numbers p.71: albiet a book full of errors, but imply that these two engines were rated at 225 hp and 240 hp (depending on the camshaft). I cannot find a Chevrolet factory source that delineates horsepower between otherwise identical engines but fitted with regular camshafts and racing camshafts.

This is why McCahill apparently can make this claim through Chevrolet's "grapevine": it wasn't being broadcast through the public.

Unpublished changes abound for 1956, so not finding a factory glossy on the issue doesn't mean it does not exist. For instance, find a factory glossy detailing the new Spring colors Colypso Cream, Grecian Gold, and that new gray shade whatever they called it. The original glossys do not include the new padded dash and safety belts because they were introduced mid-year. The same holds true with these engines. The factory color glossys don't exist.