I had a drive of a friend's 57 the other day. (The only Tri5 other than mine I have ever driven – thanks, Maurice!)
His is a stock 283 (re-built) with a stock 2 barrel Rochester carb, with original air clearer housing and paper filer.) Only modification is an electronic distributor.
On driving I noticed the pick-up (from stand still) and via kick-down was way better than my car with the stock Power Pack set-up. So now I want my car to go as well as my friends. Or better, actually!
The local mechanic has suggested doing a Pertronix upgrade (1 or 2), as have some other friends. Indeed, the read-out on the oscilloscope showed that my distributor was putting out an uneven spark – possible a bent shaft? (The bearings were changed out when it was reconditioned a few years back.)
BUT ... the engineer who built the motor (and distributor) thinks changing to electronic ignition is a bad idea and that the problem lies with the type of carburettor. He says the 2 barrel is better for performance and economy. I don't doubt the economy factor, but the 4 barrel set-up should be giving me 40 more horsepower – and that should be across the whole driving range, from standstill to highway, right? His comment is that the 4 barrel carb was always too big for a 283 and just puts too much fuel into the cylinders – better suited to 307s and 327s.
How true could his opinion be? He's old school, and admits, it – but has built hundreds of Chev motors over the years, for all sorts of uses and seems like he knows his stuff.
I know my carb is good – it was on a machine last week and had the mixture screws set just right.
His is a stock 283 (re-built) with a stock 2 barrel Rochester carb, with original air clearer housing and paper filer.) Only modification is an electronic distributor.
On driving I noticed the pick-up (from stand still) and via kick-down was way better than my car with the stock Power Pack set-up. So now I want my car to go as well as my friends. Or better, actually!
The local mechanic has suggested doing a Pertronix upgrade (1 or 2), as have some other friends. Indeed, the read-out on the oscilloscope showed that my distributor was putting out an uneven spark – possible a bent shaft? (The bearings were changed out when it was reconditioned a few years back.)
BUT ... the engineer who built the motor (and distributor) thinks changing to electronic ignition is a bad idea and that the problem lies with the type of carburettor. He says the 2 barrel is better for performance and economy. I don't doubt the economy factor, but the 4 barrel set-up should be giving me 40 more horsepower – and that should be across the whole driving range, from standstill to highway, right? His comment is that the 4 barrel carb was always too big for a 283 and just puts too much fuel into the cylinders – better suited to 307s and 327s.
How true could his opinion be? He's old school, and admits, it – but has built hundreds of Chev motors over the years, for all sorts of uses and seems like he knows his stuff.
I know my carb is good – it was on a machine last week and had the mixture screws set just right.